Anuncio
Mercados españoles cerrados
  • IBEX 35

    11.154,60
    +170,90 (+1,56%)
     
  • Euro Stoxx 50

    5.006,85
    +67,84 (+1,37%)
     
  • Dólar/Euro

    1,0703
    -0,0030 (-0,28%)
     
  • Petróleo Brent

    89,39
    +0,38 (+0,43%)
     
  • Oro

    2.349,70
    +7,20 (+0,31%)
     
  • Bitcoin EUR

    59.736,98
    -721,02 (-1,19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1.332,95
    -63,59 (-4,55%)
     
  • DAX

    18.161,01
    +243,73 (+1,36%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8.139,83
    +60,97 (+0,75%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5.111,95
    +63,53 (+1,26%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38.301,45
    +215,65 (+0,57%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15.962,19
    +350,43 (+2,24%)
     
  • Petróleo WTI

    83,75
    +0,18 (+0,22%)
     
  • EUR/GBP

    0,8563
    -0,0010 (-0,12%)
     
  • Plata

    27,29
    -0,06 (-0,23%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37.934,76
    +306,28 (+0,81%)
     

The case for a billion Americans

The case for a billion Americans

Americans can’t agree on anything—but can they agree on more of themselves? Matt Yglesias, a policy journalist and co-founder of Vox, argues that they can in a new book, One Billion Americans: The case for Thinking Bigger. Yglesias argues that the US has plenty of room for new people to live without compromising living standards or threatening wild spaces: even a billion-person population will leave the lower 48 states less densely populated than Germany, Italy, or the UK are today.